«

Anyone remember the old one for SNES? God that game was a POS!!!! :angry:

Actually, it wasn't that bad...

[Mickey Bitsko]

I remember playing this as a Nintendo game, a long time ago. Possibly before Super Nintendo. I had the flu and was stuck in bed for a couple of weeks and played this all the time. But I never got very far. It was both frustrating and fun. I thought the music was menacing and creepy. I'll have to check out the pc version.

The second part of the game, which you obviously did not get to, is a first-person shooter using an engine that is, at least in technological areas, somewhere between Doom and Duke Nukem 3D. It's an extremely fun section of the game. Very moody and involving, and you aren't as 'left out to dry' as you are in earlier sections of the game. Have to beware though, it can slug along fairly slowly on a SX-33 to the point of a crawl.

[The Duke]

i started playing it its kinda stupid. has anyone read the book.

its soooo different from the movie for instance Dr hammond dies in the book but lives in the movie and dr malcome dies in the book but lives in the movie and the layer lies in the book but dies in the move and the try-hard aussie(i would know i live in australia) hunter muldoon lives in the book but gets eaten by raptrs in the movie. thats hollywood for ya.

[MasterGrazzt]

Also in the book, the raptors could shoot lasers out of their eyes.

[The Duke]

You my friend are a tool

[edlglide]

The book is better than the movie, but that's almost always the case.

[The Duke]

very true

[xoopx]

hah the snes one was very flawed. in terms of gameplay that is. it was a good looking game with nice music and graphics, and technology. first person shooter! it shouldve had a savegame feature. it wasnt playable otherwise.

"trespasser" was a great game on pc.. i wonder if its abandonware? it was on sold out label, but i dont know if they still sell it