|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Beograd, Serbia and Montenegro
Posts: 2,838
|
![]() Yes, but we should start adding big archives on the main site. Not exactly 700MB CD images, but some newer games would be fine. And I think that review should be going to AT while we are still uncertain about 340MB big archive...
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#2 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Linz, Austria
Posts: 284
|
![]() Comes time, comes faster internets and more bandwith at reduced prices.
Last edited by Wicky; 12-01-2010 at 12:54 PM. |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#3 | ||
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
|
![]() True.
However. The average transfer on the file server amounts to every game on the site being downloaded ~10 times a day, and monthly bandwidth from the game downloads and music area exceeds three terabytes a month (yes, TERABYTES) already. Basing on that, adding a single 700 MB CD image would increase the bandwidth usage by approximately 7 GB a day and 210 GB a month. I don't really see us going to 350 MB archives anywhere soon. |
||
![]() ![]() |
|