Quote:
Originally posted by plix+Jan 23 2006, 05:02 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (plix @ Jan 23 2006, 05:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Xalo@Jan 23 2006, 10:06 AM
i use pascal and basic... nothing too special, but quite good for my age. i'm the only here who hates all those "visual" langauges? why all that (word).(word).(word).(word).(word).(word).(word).( word).(word).(word).(word).(word) is necesary? i understand object programing but thats not order to make it more easy, it's like bureaucracy!!
|
Object-orientation didn't originate with, nor is it unique to, the "Visual" family of programming language dialects. Furthermore, OOP provides the same abstraction as a bureaucracy, but that abstraction provides a lot more than just complex indirection. I love procedural programming as much as anyone, but using OOP for large projects (anything over 10k lines or so) makes the source a lot easier to understand and maintain. [/b][/quote]
maybe it is easier for big projects, but still i dislike this system(it's only my personal opinion).