|
![]() |
#1 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ljutomer, Slovenia
Posts: 3,883
|
![]() I think there's nothing wrong with the system.
Most games aren't that special, so there are people that like the game or the genre and they give it marks 4 & 5 and there are people that dislike the genre/game and give it marks 1 & 2. 3 is right in the middle and that means that the games that got 3 don't really stand out that much. Those games obvioulsy didn't leave such an impact on the general public. On the other hand games with either 2 or 4 stand out, because they made a really bad/good impresion on people. It's almost imposible for a game to have a rating of 1 or 5 anyway. If a game recives one vote for 5 point it would take seven votes of 1 to get the average down to 1 (and the other way around). For every 3 a game recives it would need two 5s to get the average back to 5 (but after a few 3s the number of 5s needed would increase). So generally a game has no alternative but to end up with a 3 (unless it's really that much better or worse from the average). |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How come the "Your rating" for most games averages out to 3? | WilliamC23 | Blah, blah, blah... | 14 | 06-10-2008 10:51 AM |
Rating Extension | Adamg | Old Suggestions | 4 | 02-03-2008 06:12 PM |
Playing Abandon Games In Public | noodles | Blah, blah, blah... | 6 | 07-05-2007 02:45 PM |
User Rating | kleine777 | Blah, blah, blah... | 1 | 30-11-2005 05:54 PM |
New Rating System | Hkizzle | Old Suggestions | 2 | 18-03-2005 05:20 AM |
|
|
||
  |