Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Blah, blah, blah...
Memberlist Forum Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

View Poll Results: Walking Dead or Fallout?
Z-Day 7 25.93%
Wasteland is my way 20 74.07%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2010, 10:17 PM   #1
The Bard
Abandonia Bard
 
The Bard's Avatar


 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Velika Gorica, Croatia
Posts: 117
Default War never changes n' shit

I gots a question: if you had to choose between a Zombocalypse and a Nuclear Apocalypse (fallout/mad max) to live in, which would you choose and why?
__________________
Founder of F.A.G., Free Abandonia Group
The Bard is offline                         Send a private message to The Bard
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 10:42 PM   #2
Tomekk
Master of Orion
 
Tomekk's Avatar


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Caves, Antique and Barbuda
Posts: 870
Send a message via Yahoo to Tomekk
Default

Nuclear apocalypse.

Why? Fallout :thumbs:
__________________
"I want to be able to tell some poor girl i am going to feed off of, that she will see me in her dreams as a dinosaur" - DarthHelmet86

"that's what all jrpgs are about

0: intro
1: talk talk cry talk talk graphics talk talk,
2: boring jrpg generic turn based combat
3: walk map
4: goto 1 12390482309 times
5: outro"
- _r.u.s.s.

Last edited by Tomekk; 05-02-2010 at 10:52 PM.
Tomekk is offline                         Send a private message to Tomekk
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 10:46 PM   #3
Fubb
GreatCanadianMan
 
Fubb's Avatar


 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Swan River, Canada
Posts: 842
Default

i chose fallout for this simple reason;

Less threats. There could be thousands of zombies ina single area, where as in the Nuclear world you'll only have a few raiders or something. Sure, radiation would be there and in the real world none of us (or atleast, you gusy that live in cities) would live long enough to even see the effects of radioactive fallout, but for smaller populated areas liek my town i'd get to see general anarchy take over. Remember, we'd live in the immidiate aftermath of world War 3, not years later like the Fallout games!
__________________
Kugarfang: o hai guiz im trying to find this techno song from the radio and it goes like this:

DUN duuuunnnn dudududududun SPLOOSH duuunnnnn


We ate the horse.
Fubb is offline                         Send a private message to Fubb
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 11:06 PM   #4
El Quia
Abandonia Homie
 
El Quia's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capital Federal, Argentina
Posts: 582
Default

No love for the stiffs
El Quia is offline                         Send a private message to El Quia
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 12:05 AM   #5
TheChosen
"I" in the Team
 
TheChosen's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 2,236
Default

If the bombs would drop, the future might not, and probably wont be, anything like Mad Max or Fallout.

Go see a film called "Threads". I've heard its pretty horrifying.
TheChosen is offline                         Send a private message to TheChosen
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 02:13 AM   #6
esgmaster
Super Freak
 
esgmaster's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 176
Default

This is pretty much choosing weither you'd like to freeze to death or be burned to death. Both are unpleasant as heck, and you don't what 'em to happen.

That aside, a nuclear apoc would be easier to survive in.
esgmaster is offline                         Send a private message to esgmaster
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 03:10 AM   #7
El Quia
Abandonia Homie
 
El Quia's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capital Federal, Argentina
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by esgmaster View Post
This is pretty much choosing weither you'd like to freeze to death or be burned to death. Both are unpleasant as heck, and you don't what 'em to happen.

That aside, a nuclear apoc would be easier to survive in.

Well, not really, radiactivity and nuclear winter sucks... but at least, the odds are that your dead would be a lot more impersonal than in a zombie apocalypse.. I mean, I would prefer to die because of impersonal radiation poisoning or out of hunger than being devoured by a ravenous zombie!
El Quia is offline                         Send a private message to El Quia
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 05:47 AM   #8
Himmler
Trollmaster General
 
Himmler's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,021
Default

fallout! moar meat on some people!
Himmler is offline                         Send a private message to Himmler
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 10:00 AM   #9
Panthro
Man of Science
 
Panthro's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Posts: 380
Default

Zombi-pocalypse for me.

No radioactivity, plenty of food, fuel and water for survival. Also, there's a rather clear end-game... get rid of the zombies, and the world is okay again.

Nukes covering everything would kinda spoil the earth a bit, doncha think?
Panthro is offline                         Send a private message to Panthro
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 04:17 AM   #10
supa_mario
Abandonia nerd
 
supa_mario's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 59
Default

I voted for Nuclear apocalypse but I now realise that I'd prefer a zombie one. I've always wanted to loot a supermarket in a zombie apocalypse (Cliched much?).
supa_mario is offline                         Send a private message to supa_mario
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 06:52 AM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.