«

[Havell]

Originally posted by Blood-Pigggy@Sep 13 2005, 10:00 PM
Count normally bum.
28

No

enin-ytnewt

[Blood-Pigggy]

30
Ye us a duomcop

[BeefontheBone]

Originally posted by Blood-Pigggy@Sep 13 2005, 10:00 PM
Count normally bum.

31 bum.

[Blood-Pigggy]

32
Weener weenis

[Havell]

100001

[Blood-Pigggy]

34

[a1s]

Originally posted by R Havell@Sep 13 2005, 09:00 PM
5477656e74792d6569676874

when 99% of world population say "hex" (or of the people who say that, to be more precise) they mean "hexodecimal sysem of counting" (base 16), not " nuber spelled in ascii charecters as it would be seen in hex editor". have to be in that 1% of madmen and anarchists don't you?
35, BTW

[bruno]

you just pass 26 but now 36

[Havell]

Originally posted by a1s+Sep 13 2005, 10:09 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (a1s @ Sep 13 2005, 10:09 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-R Havell@Sep 13 2005, 09:00 PM
5477656e74792d6569676874

when 99% of world population say "hex" (or of the people who say that, to be more precise) they mean "hexodecimal sysem of counting" (base 16), not " nuber spelled in ascii charecters as it would be seen in hex editor". have to be in that 1% of madmen and anarchists don't you?
35, BTW [/b][/quote]
Yeah, in my "3133" post I used the ASCII characters method, not that counting method.

37

[Fruit Pie Jones]

73. In radix-5, of course.

EDIT: Oops. That's 123, not 73. There's no 7 in radix-5, idiot.