06-01-2006, 01:23 AM | #11 | ||
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 608
|
Titan, I'll resist the urge to offer spelling and grammar corrections for your statement. ...you cognitively brilliant Swede.
...I jest because I love. |
||
|
|
06-01-2006, 01:26 AM | #12 | ||
|
Quote:
__________________
Meh.... |
||
|
|
06-01-2006, 01:28 AM | #13 | ||
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 608
|
...oh when will I learn that this screen name does more harm then good?
|
||
|
|
06-01-2006, 02:16 AM | #14 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 1,390
|
I ran a red light with a camera for an ambulance 'cause it came up behind me and all lanes were full so it couldn't get through. Didn't see a flash and haven't gotten a fine yet and it was about a month and a half ago.
|
||
|
|
06-01-2006, 03:26 AM | #15 | ||
|
You are allowed to speed or go against red light, if it's to make room for fire/ambulance/police when they run the blue light, as long as you don't place yourself or anyone else in danger.
going against red light is OK, if you just go out a little to make room, and do so slowly, so cars from the side gets a chanse to stop. A good friend of mine was "chased" by an ambulance @ 180 km/hr on a 1-file-to-2-file road for a good 7 KM's, before the road came to the point where his lane way epanded into 2. It's a common problem here unfortunally, since it's a cost-effective way for the traffic-deparment to build 3 lanes instead of 4 (3 total, not each direction). The emergency-services are protesting all the time, since they sometimes get stuck behind a truck that is incapable to speeds over 100km/hr, and can't move. And since the road is seperated by steel-wire, the ambulance can't simply drive past it
__________________
Meh.... |
||
|
|
06-01-2006, 03:34 AM | #16 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 1,390
|
Yes but how would the camera know I did it for an ambulance?
Would they have gotten a shot of me, the car behind me and the Ambulance going through and just ignored them? |
||
|
|