|
View Poll Results: What compressing format should abandonia use? | |||
Zip |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 35.71% |
Rar |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 46.43% |
Ace |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 10.71% |
7-zip |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.57% |
Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.57% |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 107
|
![]() What do you think?
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#2 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() absolute RAR...it`s my favourite program for unzipping..
BTW: Nice poll
__________________
i jus luv abandonia!! |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#3 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valleyfield, Canada
Posts: 4,892
|
![]() Voted RAR. Don't think I need to say something about the subject, it already been discussed elsewhere.
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#4 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I`m not that long here..so missed the discussion :angel:
__________________
i jus luv abandonia!! |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#5 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ranelagh, Ireland
Posts: 1,577
|
![]() |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#6 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Split, Croatia
Posts: 1,028
|
![]() I voted for zip.
Why? Because it's standard (I know abandonia is breaking every standard :bleh: ) I have 56k connection, but I don't mind. If you haven't noticed WinRar has compression metods which vary from fastest (larger) to best (smaller file size). So if you didn't use WinRar's best compression metod - GET TO WORK!!! Just to mention this can be used to compress in zip format, so you don't have to change extension, to change size! |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
![]() The two ZIP and RAR formats of WinRar are still different, so the ending has to be either .zip or .rar.
Well, of course I voted for RAR. But as you probably almost all know, to convert all the archives on the site from ZIP to RAR would take heck of a time, so it was decided to not to convert them. In that case the vote is only interesting for seeing how many people would like the idea of converting... |
||
|
|
![]() |
#8 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I can already tell that if this get through..... the work is going to fall on my shoulders
The sick thing is.... I would do it to... I'm loco! :w00t:
__________________
ViGERP AKA what I have been working on these last couple of years... |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#9 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#10 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 40
|
![]() I voted zip. Rar is maybe better, but like Kosta said, zip is still standard for most people around. Especially for not so experienced one. I think dos emulation is complicated enough for them. Don't make any needless changes. It isn't worth it.
c ya gdp2k |
||
![]() ![]() |
|