View Single Post
Old 26-06-2007, 08:51 AM   #13
Stroggy
Home Sweet Abandonia

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 1,342
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sebatianos @ Jun 25 2007, 06:56 PM) [snapback]296319[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
No use in members disscussing their interpretations of the linking rules. [/b]
No use? My dear Seb, arguing about the interpretation of rules is all I've been doing for the past year. Whether it's the Forum Guidelines or the Terrorism Act 2006, nitpicking about the rules certainly does serve a point!
Why, this thread could be seen as case-law clarifying the law and a link to this thread should be added to the forum rules thread. I call this thread 'Tiberius v. Abandonia.com'

Isn't it great? This forum is evolving so rapidly it nearly has it's own Judiciary! The lack of a separation of powers in forums has always struck me as odd.
__________________
pat b
Stroggy is offline                         Send a private message to Stroggy
Reply With Quote