| 25-02-2007 01:28 PM | |
| Japo |
The filesize restriction is understandable, but I don't understand the pixelsize one, my old 300 pixels broad one --but only 15 kb heavy-- fitted pretty well in the profile layout. Especially since the image hosted is not shrinked, when I access the direct link via the tiny image in my profile, it's my big image again. And I'm pretty sure there were no pixelsize restrictions when I uploaded the image the first time, why were they added? And right now the link to my image is broken (?) |
| 25-02-2007 03:28 AM | |
| Titan |
ummm.. no? Well, we'll look at it when we prep. the new layout i suppose, but right now, i belive it'll be a no on that unfortunally. As always, Kosta i your God  (If you didn't get that last part, just PM kosta and ask) |
| 20-02-2007 09:57 PM | |
| Scatty |
Anyone responsible is going to reply here? It would be nice to say something, even if it's a "no" 
|
| 15-02-2007 07:09 PM | |
| Saphire |
Hello there, is it maybe possible to loosen the dimension of the personal photo in the profile options if the photo is a link from another site and not uploaded from own computer? That way there shouldn't be any strain to the site and users can still have better photos than this small 120x120 image that's almost in nothing better than the avatar. I've also noticed some users who have large or even huge photos, so shouldn't it be evened for everybody? |
