| 26-12-2005 07:45 AM | ||
| punch999 |
I enjoy having all the laughing emotes because it looks really corny having a post full of lo'l instead of LOL |
|
| 23-12-2005 10:45 AM | ||
| SupSuper |
My point wasn't that there were 2 different emoticons, but rather that the second one showed up wrong: Apparently though, this doesn't happen in Firefox (I use Opera :P), but try quoting my post and see for yourself. I think it's got something to do that :LOL: can create both the still and the animated emoticons all in one, which... well, confuses IPB 
|
|
| 23-12-2005 12:09 AM | ||
| wendymaree |
I like the present acromyn for the still one as it's easy to remember  Thanks for that  k:
|
|
| 22-12-2005 06:53 PM | ||
| Braindead |
Quote:
|
|
| 22-12-2005 10:05 AM | ||
| bruno | i like this LOL | |
| 22-12-2005 01:57 AM | ||
| wendymaree |
Any chance that we could have the still one as the second option (or the : L OL : )as sometimes the moving one comes across as corny if you add it to a pm. The exisiting double emoticon could be removed, I think, thanks, Braindead. In other words, I'm voting for both LOL and the the still emoticon as a replacement for the double emoticon : L O L : please. |
|
| 21-12-2005 07:19 PM | ||
| kleine777 | LOL l0l what i didnt get it? huh? | |
| 21-12-2005 07:15 PM | ||
| troop18546 |
Quote:
|
|
| 21-12-2005 06:22 PM | ||
| Braindead |
it are 2 different emo's, you can choose it depending on the amount of laughing you have to do  well maybe I should remove the :[img]http://www.abandonia.com/forum/html/emoticons/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /> one... what 'd you think? |
|
| 21-12-2005 06:18 PM | ||
| ReamusLQ | ...with this information...I could...RULE THE WORLD! WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :twisted: | |
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
