«

The game is Dylan Dog: The Murderers, not Dylan Dog: Through the Looking Glass, which is very good quest. The Murderers is very good game too despite all the drawbacks. The main thing here is atmosphere, you should play for 3 or so hours to get it.

//Dimouse.

[TheVoid]

Originally posted by Guest@Dec 16 2005, 01:53 PM
The game is Dylan Dog: The Murderers, not Dylan Dog: Through the Looking Glass, which is very good quest. The Murderers is very good game too despite all the drawbacks. The main thing here is atmosphere, you should play for 3 or so hours to get it.

//Dimouse.

Looks like you're right.

Fixed. Thanks for pointing this out.

[Braindead]

Originally posted by TheChosen+Dec 16 2005, 10:07 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TheChosen @ Dec 16 2005, 10:07 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Braindead@Dec 15 2005, 08:58 PM
thanks for reviewing it TheVoid!

:ranting: [/b][/quote]
oops :angel:

thank you for reviewing it TheChosen was what I meant of course... :whistle:

[marko river]

I apologize for not bringing this stuff much sooner. I just recently bothered with finishing Dylan Dog but review was somewhat suspicious when i first read it (for example that 666 points, i thought that Dylan's energy is that grave). I forgot about that later and it stayed that way for months. Recently i found Dylan Dog among my games and wanted to finally beat the game. So i refreshed my memory about this game.

Today i rememberd that Dylan is already on site and i wanted to read the review again. Now, i really don't want to be rude, as a matter a fact, i am being very polite - this review is completely wrong and horrible. I don't even think that reviewer walked through more than just a few rooms, unless he had trainer for bullets. Game, although seems dull at the first, becomes very good later. Well, i was disappointed with the end but still game is fine. Considering stuff within the games, puzzles and movement, i get the impression that reviewer didn't even started the game because i don't agree with reviewer at all. I know that this sounds like a clash of my and reviewer's taste but i really feel it is much deeper.

Poiints, time and energy are not what it is stated in the review (actually time wasn't mentioned), Dylan's movement is smooth and realistic, only he is slow so it seems dull (in C64 version he was running all the time, much better solution) and puzzles are easy considering the secrets that Dylan is learning from other people (at this point i realized the reviewer must have finished the game). As for the items, i didn't found no use for them, except fot the keys, which doesn't mean that there is no use for them. Then again, maybe there isn't.

I really think that this review should be changed. I apologize to Chosen if i offended him in any way, but mistakes in the review considering some basic stuff within the game made me post this. I will be glad to write new review, or to correct thechosen with this one, although i really think this should be written all over again.

Also, i want to know, if Chosen managed to beat the game, did he had any problems with security check. I must download this archive from the site to see is there any differences with the one i have. I can supply solution too.

I expect to be contacted by someone about this game soon.

[Tulac]

There's a forum now where you can post you own reviews:
http://www.abandonia.com/forum/index.php?showforum=34

[oclane]

the name dylan dog dosent realy sound very interesting if i was in a game shop when it was there i would probebly walk right passed it

[marko river]

I was unaware of existence of the community review forum. Actually it sounds like a good idea. I'll get to it.

[The Fifth Horseman]

The review forum is a very recent addition.

[Dac X Lee]

Pressing shift 5 times brings me back to Windows asking me about sticky keys, is there a way to either turn this off or change the fire button?

[The Fifth Horseman]

You can disable it in Windows settings.