05-09-2011, 10:25 PM | #1 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 50
|
Will all Abandonware sites be blocked?
Will all Abandonware sites be blocked?
For a couple years a bill has been raised in the US Senate, which would greatly increase the ability to the US government, as well as private corporations in removing access to sites on the internet. Last year it was called COICA in its current incarnation its called the PROTECT IP Act, its contents are summed up in its wiki article: Edited on 01/11/11: New Info on Laws!!! The original bills COICA & PROTECT IP have been twice held up in the Senate by Senator Ron Wyden. So, now its been raised in Congress after being rename "SOPA". It's basically the same bill only with even more overbroad wording, plus they slipped in parts of the Streaming Criminalization Bill S.978 The whole point of this law is to block off access to all "Foreign Sites", which are beyond the reach of US Copyright Law. They want mass IP Blocking + Search Result Censoring powers to use on offshore Websites by all US ISP & Search Providers. Also the power to issue injunctions to US Payment Processing Companies (PayPal, etc...), to stop all money going to those sites. Edit: 02/11/11 Apparently, websites that offer ways or tools to bypass blocks are also to be blocked off... Websites in the USA are already vulnerable to being seized under current laws (see Operation In Our Sites). However these new powers would also no doubt be used against domestic sites as well... Old Info: Still Relevant to the held up Bills in the Senate. The Entertainment Software Association stated on their website that they supports the bill: link While the main attention is likely sites that host current gen games, ESA has stated on numerous occasion their negative opinion of Abandonware. If they have an easy tool to block "infringing sites" from the US altogether, why not block Hotud & Abandonia while they're at it. Edited on 02/11/11 This may turn out bigger then I thought... Considering the "Shoot first, ask questions later" attitude of the Copyright Industry, they could well try to make Internet in the USA into their own private Intranet... Last edited by Red Fortress; 02-11-2011 at 06:44 AM. |
||
|
|
06-09-2011, 12:25 AM | #2 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valleyfield, Canada
Posts: 4,892
|
You now owe me 1¢...
|
||
|
|
06-09-2011, 01:20 AM | #3 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 50
|
|
||
|
|
06-09-2011, 02:32 AM | #4 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valleyfield, Canada
Posts: 4,892
|
Because if I had gotten 1¢ every time someone posted something supposedly alarming... I'd be filthy rich by now.
|
||
|
|
06-09-2011, 06:26 PM | #5 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ,
Posts: 4,613
|
True that governments everywhere are looking at harsher and more intrusive copyright laws every day, however since ever Abandonia will stop hosting any game if we only received a letter from the copyright owner, with no need for any legal procedure. So we're not one of the defiant websites that are likely to be targeted by this--although I haven't read any of it. We don't offer any contend and we have remained in the abandonware business all this time precisely because abandonware is abandoned, that is nobody cares.
Funny that you're more alarmed about private corporations than the government (without a court warrant), specially since this is a purely legal matter and corporations would be powerless without the government's enforcing this privilege for them.
__________________
Life starts every day anew. Prospects not so good... |
||
|
|
06-09-2011, 10:35 PM | #6 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
I'm afraid that this law will turn into a “We Aim, You Shoot” kind of deal, with Companies using the Government to take down loads of Sites that they dislike. Quote:
That is pretty vague, and can be stretched to cover all sorts of stuff... Read this on the ESA's Site: Link Plus this article From gamepolitics.com: ESA Altered Wikipedia Entries on Mod Chips, Abandonware That sound like they think abandonware should not exsist at all ... If they were to get a "kill switch", whats to stop them using it on us? Last edited by Red Fortress; 06-09-2011 at 10:54 PM. |
||
|
|
07-09-2011, 06:06 AM | #7 | ||
|
Not to sound rude, but the internet is not the US. This site is certainly not hosted in the US. And unless they can get the ones they want to sue to US soil, the US laws don't apply. So they can take their draconian rules and show it up their collective asses, as soon as they cross the ocean.
__________________
Angelus Errare, where angels lose their way
|
||
|
|
07-09-2011, 06:59 AM | #8 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 3,273
|
It's still a nasty, grubby little policy regardless of whether or not it affects this site. Besides who wants something like that as a precedent? Yuck.
__________________
I have vestigial adventure elements |
||
|
|
07-09-2011, 10:35 AM | #9 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valleyfield, Canada
Posts: 4,892
|
Quote:
I'm not from the USA either. Beside, laws like this try to pass every year/two years in the US. There is a reason why it doesn't: they don't really make sense. |
||
|
|
07-09-2011, 05:11 PM | #10 | |||
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ,
Posts: 4,613
|
I agree with Lulu, and this kind of thing is showing its face ever more often lately. And they say that if you start smoking weed you may end up smoking crack cocaine, but if they start restricting Internet access for these reasons, I wonder where they might end up.
Quote:
But what little I read about this, I understood it's not about shutting down sites--what they can already do, and another recent US law widened the government's discretionary and executive powers to do so, and disposed of any bothersome judicial procedures. I think it's about denying US citizens access to infringing content, even if it's hosted abroad and continues to be online elsewhere. They don't seem to have gone as far as the Great Firewall of China (for all the anti-American talk, probably the USA will be the last country to implement country-wide WAN firewalling, I think several "democracies" were considering it--or had any already made it... Australia? But depending on what is decided, it could mean just that. They plan to require all services within their jurisdiction (hosted in the US?) to remove any access to the infringing content (even if their servers remain online), and these services may include search sites (Google...) and even DNS servers (good luck with that, as if pirates would mind typing a numeric IP address instead of an alpha-numeric domain name, LOL). Again the legal framework will be different in your country, freer or harsher, but this is about affecting the content US citizens are allowed to see. And we're allowed to care about them. And once these laws are acceptable in one "democratic" country, they're automatically up for consideration in every other one. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Life starts every day anew. Prospects not so good... |
|||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
old sites | Isto | Old Suggestions | 2 | 13-05-2008 10:08 PM |
Other Abandonware Sites | TheChosen | Blah, blah, blah... | 10 | 01-04-2007 08:38 PM |
486 Computer Sites? | LJChronx | General compatibility fixes | 32 | 21-02-2007 01:54 AM |
Ab & Ar Nominated Best Designed Abandonware Sites | Maikel | Blah, blah, blah... | 33 | 02-04-2006 01:02 AM |
Twu Awsome Sites | Ioncannon | Blah, blah, blah... | 14 | 20-01-2005 12:27 AM |
|
|
||
  |