Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Blah, blah, blah...
Memberlist Forum Rules Today's Posts
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-07-2005, 01:16 PM   #21
omg
Games Master

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Apocalypse Dude@Jul 21 2005, 11:03 AM
Most movie sequels suck,
erm you what? have you even read any of the previos posts.
omg is offline                         Send a private message to omg
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 02:54 PM   #22
Spoonman
Flyswatter
 
Spoonman's Avatar


 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by R Havell+Jul 21 2005, 11:49 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (R Havell @ Jul 21 2005, 11:49 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Apocalypse Dude@Jul 21 2005, 12:03 PM
Simon the Sorcerer 2 (btw does any one know where I can get Simon 3)
If you mean the 3D one, then don't bother, that one does follow the rule of sequels being crap. [/b][/quote]
I disagree, I think that besides of the pretty bad graphics it's still a good game (I enjoyed running around the green fields endlessly wearing a dress a lot somehow :P). But definitely not better thatn 1 or 2, that's true.
__________________
"Sometimes you eat the bar and sometimes.. well, he eats you." - The Stranger
Spoonman is offline                         Send a private message to Spoonman
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 02:55 PM   #23
Apocalypse Dude
Super Freak

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 172
Default

Sorry, it's not a personal offence to your previous post EDIT (I already said most )

Well LOTR and the the empire strikes back don;t really count as sequels since there part of a triology and as for the others , they are good movies but in general most sequels movies have a lousy story and are only there to make easy money. I mean take a look a the sequels to "the crow"
Apocalypse Dude is offline                         Send a private message to Apocalypse Dude
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 02:55 PM   #24
PrejudiceSucks
Above-Par
 
PrejudiceSucks's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York, England
Posts: 741
Default

Nah, the original UT was best...
PrejudiceSucks is offline                         Send a private message to PrejudiceSucks
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 02:56 PM   #25
omg
Games Master

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Well LOTR and the the empire strikes back don;t really count as sequels since there part of a triology and as for the others , they are good movies but in general most sequels movies have a lousy story and are only there to make easy money. I mean take a look a the sequels to "the crow"
but according to you if its a trilogy part 2 dont count..? so how can you count the sequals to the crow then?
besides i know people whio think the crow sucked badly.
omg is offline                         Send a private message to omg
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 02:58 PM   #26
Apocalypse Dude
Super Freak

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 172
Default

ohw sorry to step on your toes....
Apocalypse Dude is offline                         Send a private message to Apocalypse Dude
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 03:00 PM   #27
omg
Games Master

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 303
Default

its not that you are stepping on my toes it is that you have no evidence to back up your opinion.
"sequals to movies always suck" is one of those opinions you often come across on the net that people spout on the basis of one sequal movie that they dont like. its an absurd generlisation.
omg is offline                         Send a private message to omg
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 03:00 PM   #28
Apocalypse Dude
Super Freak

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 172
Default

I said MOST!!!! in your words have YOU read any of the posts
Apocalypse Dude is offline                         Send a private message to Apocalypse Dude
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 03:04 PM   #29
omg
Games Master

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 303
Default

name them then. go on. name more sequals that sucked than i can sequals that didnt suck. i think you will find i will be able to state more non sucky sequals than you can sucky sequals. which will mean that MOST sequals do not suck.

edit: and im talking movies here not games. for the record though i liked halo 2 more than the first.
omg is offline                         Send a private message to omg
Reply With Quote
Old 21-07-2005, 03:05 PM   #30
PrejudiceSucks
Above-Par
 
PrejudiceSucks's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York, England
Posts: 741
Default

What's the bloody topic title then?
PrejudiceSucks is offline                         Send a private message to PrejudiceSucks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I suck Pox Introductions, Farewells and Returns 17 30-03-2009 02:34 PM
I Would Like To Play Some Games But I A: Suck At Dosbox And B: Have No Clue How To Make A Boot Disk For Win Xp. bizarrejpeg Troubleshooting 14 16-10-2006 11:08 AM
Biggest Time Suck dragonLancer Gaming Zone 26 20-03-2005 04:45 PM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 05:17 PM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.