«

[CrybKeeper]

Originally Posted by JudgeDeadd

My two cents...

- I don't like the cover. It's a bunch of images arranged randomly on a generic gradient background.

- I dislike the whole "Versus" idea. I'm afraid that editors will simply be afraid to rate a new game higher than the old one, since that would be a "blasphemy", and thus the old game will be typically elected the victor simply for being old.

- There's a phrase loosely hanging ("...Duke of Ander's Moon is anointed") at the top of page 9.

- The quote on page 10 is rather pointless and badly chosen, as Simoneer pointed out.

- I disliked the "2D or not 2D" article. It states a lot of obvious information ("2D is just not fashionable anymore. Young gamers prefer flashy 3D" - no, really?) and basically says nothing new. We all know that 2S graphics are all right, there's no need to take up a whole page for it.

Actually, I understand your points Mr. Deadd. Now please, tell us what we can do to make it better? What's your WOW factor? If can please you, we can surely please the rest of the human race, eh?

I read the entire mag and all 4 pages of this topic. I must say, I can hardly resist replying to every posting here, with a very, VERY long post. Since it may get long, I am going to continue this with the staff.

Think I'm safe saying,

There is no doubt, that we want everyone to enjoy AT Magazine. Everyones thoughts and positive suggestions are most appreciated and considered important to us.

[Saccade]

Retracted.

[Acethor]

What do you mean by retracted Pete? I've been seeing the same word posted by you in several other threads.

[Simoneer]

Uh... That he has retracted the post? That is, change his mind about writing what he did, and replace that text with ''retracted''. Since you can't delete posts.

Personally, I just change the text to something fitting in those cases...

[El Quia]

But the post doesn't say that it has been edited, so I don't know if it really is what you say or something else... although what you say makes sense.

[Simoneer]

If you quickly edit after you post something, or just don't edit too many times, the edited-thing doesn't appear under the post. Try it.


...As you can see, the ''last edited by''-thing has appeared under my post now. That's because I edited it like... 7 times. After having revisited the thread, too.

[The Fifth Horseman]

Ah, I see.

[Acethor]

Actually I figured it out... if you edit your post within the same minute that you posted it won't show up as 'edited'. But it still stumps me... why would he write something, post it, then immediately remove it? And... he wrote it in at least 6 or 7 other threads I've seen around. So its something he's doing on purpose obviously.

[Japo]

I wouldn't mind myself with this and wouldn't continue this

[Saccade]

Originally Posted by Japo

I wouldn't mind myself with this and wouldn't continue this

Concur - thanks Japo.

Retracted = Redacted = if you can't remember it when it was first posted, why think about it now?
Read as:
I removed the posts because I wanted to (as I can't delete them) and hadn't anything to say that would "fit in". I'm not changing my opinions, but I know when they are not going to be read as they are intended - that's it.

To be dropped and forgotten, carry on "on topic".
Final Word.

Let's get back on Topic, eh?