03-06-2009, 01:13 PM | #11 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norman, United States
Posts: 109
|
Let's say you have a kid, and they're all like "Hey dad, I just downloaded super-crazy-cool-abandonware game, k?" So then you're all like "Well, this game had better not have peter rabbit with a pike through his head like your last game." So you go to the review, and it says that it's T/13+/whatever, so you can cool it, for there will be no head spiking today.
|
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 01:43 PM | #12 | ||
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nitra, Slovakia
Posts: 6,533
|
nobody ever cares about those notices. it only ruins the fun for kids, in case of the parents who do
and we never put adult games mature sexual content on this website. by the way, we always warn people in case of extteme violence too. if not, then you can see it on the screenshots i think that this whole idea is a joke
__________________
|
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 03:57 PM | #13 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 3,273
|
Game ratings (like film ratings) are completely arbitrary. If you are worried about young children accidentally downloading something with objectionable content then I would be more worried about why the child is unsupervised on the computer if the parent is worried about 'bad" content.
Everybody has different ideas on what is "unsavory," I would prefer to give our users the credit that they are able to make that decision themselves by reading the review or (heaven forbid) actually trying the game - if they find the game inappropriate they can turn it off. We provide abandoned games not moral guidance. The idea of policing these games makes me really uncomfortable. Basically, if a parent is concerned about a game their child has downloaded from here they can read the review just as easily as a rating made up by somebody. Actually, I would hope they would be more interested in the review as it provides more detail about whatever thematic nuances might be "questionable," enabling them to make a more informed decision. EDIT FOR CLARITY: I don't believe a simple rating is a meaningful depiction of a games content. In the real gaming industry today or for the games on this site. That's why we have reviews.
__________________
I have vestigial adventure elements Last edited by Lulu_Jane; 03-06-2009 at 04:08 PM. |
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 04:09 PM | #14 | ||
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 1,493
|
Lulu has some very good points here. It's the parents should supervise what their young child is doing on the computer - not AB.
|
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 04:18 PM | #15 | ||
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capital Federal, Argentina
Posts: 582
|
Well, I entered the thread with all the intention on going on with a long and vitriolic rant against rating, only to find out Lulu made all the points I intended to make. So, damn you, Lulu_Jane!!!!
But, seriously, a rating is nothing more than a poor excuse for the companies to cover their asses (or try to) and for lazy parents to feel like they are involved in raising their children, while the real story is they can't be arsed about that. If parent are concerned about the games their kids are playing, they should supervise them, read the review and, if still unsure, try the game. Could even try it with the kid: that way, they could share more time together, get more involved in their free time activities and know more about their kids. Also, if something in a game is not really ok with the parents and the way they want their child to grow, they will be there to take care of it, not only by prohibiting it (thing that, usually, only ignites the interest of the kid) but also by talking with their children, explaining their vision and learning what the kids think about it. Besides, what is ok for one person, is a big nono for another. Without taking into account that different people mature at a different rate. And also, it's not Abandonia role to be a keeper of "children innocence", but to be a keeper of abandoned games. Last edited by El Quia; 03-06-2009 at 04:26 PM. Reason: Fixed some typos. |
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 06:43 PM | #16 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norman, United States
Posts: 109
|
Well, I guess I'll just have to keep wikipedia open for myself then
|
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 06:53 PM | #17 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dixmuide, Belgium
Posts: 2,767
|
Yes indeed.
And don't forget the rating principle: Killing people is OK. A boob or a nipple is NOT DONE!
__________________
Not a member of The Victorious People's Shoutbox Liberation Army. Not a member of the GAG Guerrilla. Don't get A Grip! FOR RENT *Advertising space* |
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 06:55 PM | #18 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ,
Posts: 4,613
|
Well if the child is unsupervised, the rating won't matter at all. It's supposed to be so that parents can decide without having to play the game through themselves.
__________________
Life starts every day anew. Prospects not so good... |
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 07:10 PM | #19 | ||
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Amerika, Netherlands
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
Yeah, I agree with you, parents don't care much if you blow someone's brains out in a videogame yet they turn bat-shit insane when they see someone naked in a game. Sex is a natural act. Violently murdering people is not.
__________________
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it."
-Terry Pratchett |
||
|
|
03-06-2009, 09:53 PM | #20 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Praha, Czech Republic
Posts: 3,273
|
__________________
I have vestigial adventure elements |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is there a ay to filter games by their ratings? | prunejuice | Old Suggestions | 2 | 25-02-2009 06:17 PM |
Editor's Ratings | UFO | Old Suggestions | 6 | 05-09-2007 02:01 PM |
User's Game Ratings | DSmidgy | Old Suggestions | 15 | 08-09-2005 11:53 AM |
Reviews Ratings | ultranewbie | Old Suggestions | 21 | 17-01-2005 03:56 PM |
Game Ratings | Fawfulhasfury | Old Suggestions | 10 | 10-12-2004 03:22 AM |
|
|
||
  |