24-07-2006, 10:18 AM
|
#21 | ||
    Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ,
Posts: 4,613
|
I only use Lavasoft Ad-Aware. Is there any reason why Spybot might be better?
Besides using Opera spyware never gets in --at least according to Ad-Aware. My new computer has been installed for months and all my Ad-Aware scans have yielded negative results. I'm pretty sure it would be otherwise with MS IExplorer.
__________________
Life starts every day anew. Prospects not so good... |
||
|
|
|
24-07-2006, 02:33 PM
|
#22 | ||
 Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wilmington, United States
Posts: 2,660
|
Spybot's virus/spyware tables are updated more often and they also just work faster.
__________________
Youtube Channel - http://youtube.com/user/BloodPigggy My Site - http://sites.google.com/site/eyenixon |
||
|
|
|
|
24-07-2006, 06:27 PM
|
#23 | ||
   Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 55
|
I think Ad-Aware will do it alone but Spybot S&D also is a handy program. Even there is a low chance it might find something that Ad-Aware can't find. I was used to scanning my PC with both of them but SpyBot doesn't seem to find anything different than Ad-Aware. I don't bother using it anymore but I can't argue that it is good. It's a matter of choice.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Spyware: Mywebsearch | ianfreddie07 | Tech Corner | 8 | 30-08-2007 12:31 AM |
| A Nasty Case Of Spyware | Tulac | Tech Corner | 17 | 26-10-2006 01:09 PM |
| No Spyware... | Caged | Tech Corner | 1 | 02-03-2005 01:30 PM |
|
|
||
Linear Mode
