Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Gaming Zone
Memberlist Forum Rules Today's Posts
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2005, 02:58 PM   #71
Borodin
Home Sweet Abandonia
 
Borodin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medina, United States
Posts: 978
Default

The magazine has gone steadily downhill. I know some people who used to work for PC Gamer and left, and they claim that they were being critcized for turning in less than extremely positive reviews of bigname titles. The bulk of people now on staff are new to the industry, with little understanding of its past--and that works well if you want to get "gee wiz, what a great game!" reviews out of folks with no gaming history to offer comparisons.

I honestly don't think most gamer websites that I've seen are any better. Remember, many are profit-based just like the printed publications. And most gamers in any case again lack the knowledge of past games that makes some critical apparatus possible in reviews.

My opinion, for what it's worth: find a critic whose work you think makes good common sense in the longterm, and stick with them. Give no loyalty to a site or printed magazine.
Borodin is offline                         Send a private message to Borodin
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 04:47 PM   #72
PrejudiceSucks
Above-Par
 
PrejudiceSucks's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York, England
Posts: 741
Default

I assume you're talking about PC Gamer US, not UK. UK gives some very, very scathing reviews of big name games. Also, the people in UK are extremely knowledgable about games old and new.

I've never read US, but I assume that it's crapper. Maybe that's just me, but I prefer UK magazines. They're just better made, and a lot funnier.
PrejudiceSucks is offline                         Send a private message to PrejudiceSucks
Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2005, 05:24 PM   #73
xoopx
Hero Gamer

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PrejudiceSucks@May 8 2005, 04:47 PM
I assume you're talking about PC Gamer US, not UK. UK gives some very, very scathing reviews of big name games. Also, the people in UK are extremely knowledgable about games old and new.

I've never read US, but I assume that it's crapper. Maybe that's just me, but I prefer UK magazines. They're just better made, and a lot funnier.
US magazines do seem to be worse than UK.
i remember getting a US magazine once, i forget the name, and it was seriously just page after page of screenshots. with maybe some captions.
xoopx is offline                         Send a private message to xoopx
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 02:27 PM   #74
Borodin
Home Sweet Abandonia
 
Borodin's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medina, United States
Posts: 978
Default

I don't think any general condemnation-by-nationality can be made. PC Gamer US used to be a fine publication. It's management changed about 3-4 years ago, and it's been going downhill since then.
Borodin is offline                         Send a private message to Borodin
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 02:44 PM   #75
DeathDude
Caught Somewhere In Time
 
DeathDude's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 803
Default

Yeah I agree PC Gamer used to be a good magazine, then a lot of the reviewers and writers left the magazine, pretty much it's just Greg I can think of that still part of the original crew, but the quality keeps declining, hopefully it might improve at somepoint in the future though...
__________________

http://www.last.fm/user/DeathDude/ Upcoming Concerts will be attending 5/10/08: Dream Theater, 5/12/08: Gigantour, 5/16/08: Nightwish, 5/27/08: Rush, 6/5/08 and 6/6/08: Iron Maiden!!, 7/27/08: Judas Priest
DeathDude is offline                         Send a private message to DeathDude
Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2005, 08:30 AM   #76
PrejudiceSucks
Above-Par
 
PrejudiceSucks's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: York, England
Posts: 741
Default

PC Gamer UK is a bit up and down. The last issue I got (a couple of days ago) was not that great, but the one before was fantastic.

I guess it's all about the calibre of the games released that month.
PrejudiceSucks is offline                         Send a private message to PrejudiceSucks
Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2005, 09:19 AM   #77
Stroggy
Home Sweet Abandonia

 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 1,342
Default

Yeah, the quality of the games can affect the quality of a magazine. This month was very bad since the games are very "bleh". another football manager game, a matrix game, Stronghold 2, Empire Eart 2 (after all these years they still can't make a realistic looking strategy game... why are the units so big compared to the buildings!?) and some other small games and Doom 3/HL2-clones.
__________________
pat b
Stroggy is offline                         Send a private message to Stroggy
Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2005, 10:19 AM   #78
Maktaka
Newbie

 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Abo Tanga, Afghanistan
Posts: 18
Send a message via ICQ to Maktaka Send a message via AIM to Maktaka Send a message via MSN to Maktaka Send a message via Yahoo to Maktaka
Default

Actually, I have to agree with him. Whenever I've downloaded a game from this site that I played as a kid, I've usually regretted it. The game doesn't have the same level of fun that I remember and I end up being let down. On the other hand, when I download a game from here that I've never played before, I enjoy it much more because I don't have any preconceived notions about the fun factor. I think that's where he's coming from. He got an itch to play some old games that he hadn't touched in years and was dissapointed when they didn't live up to his expectations. Although I think he took it a little too hard, I do understand where he's coming from on this. I'm just glad that I never got a chance to play X-COM as a kid, man it would suck if THAT got ruined because it couldn't live up to my memories.
Maktaka is offline                         Send a private message to Maktaka
Reply With Quote
Old 16-05-2005, 07:01 PM   #79
Microprose Veteran
Abandonia nerd

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 52
Default

Nope.

I agree that many oldies aren't that good.

But X-com is just a super game I guess. I played it a lot in the 90s and I beat it at the highest difficulty level. I've tried a few times at hardest difficulty again but I guess I lost my touch because I lost my entire team several times. Conclusion: it's still as challenging as ever (untill I beat it again).

Then there are a couple of old games I still play now and then on my C=64 and Amiga emulators...
Microprose Veteran is offline                         Send a private message to Microprose Veteran
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2005, 04:17 PM   #80
cheesegrater
Game freak

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 107
Default

Gaming magazines are lame because they inflate review scores in order to promote games. Also games always get a score of 50% or more. Lame!

__________________
little trouble
cheesegrater is offline                         Send a private message to cheesegrater
Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem Getting "gold Box" Games To Run In Dosbox. ManiacMarshall Troubleshooting 4 15-08-2010 06:20 PM
Apparent bug with "favorite games" feature Vanshilar Old Suggestions 33 30-03-2010 08:08 PM
An Idea To Replace The "games That Need Reviews" Sticky The Fifth Horseman Old Suggestions 8 22-02-2007 11:52 AM
Why Am I Not Allowed To Create A New Topic In "abandonia Games Discussion" ? ullteppe Old Suggestions 7 11-10-2006 03:28 PM
"Spectrum Games" Avatar Theme Week Havell Blah, blah, blah... 52 10-04-2006 04:43 PM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 01:43 AM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.