«

[wormpaul]

I almost never give normal games a 1 or 2...

Only games that are so weak...but that aren`t much games :not_ok:

[Iron_Scarecrow]

Well I have to say that I don't vote.

[Havell]

I agree with The Picard in the the rating of 5 should be reversed for classics, otherwise, if we had given a 5 to any game that came along and gave a few minutes fun, how would people tell the difference between them and the classics?

[Eagle of Fire]

I also completely agree with The Picard. A rating of 5 is possible, think of Master of Orion, UFO: Ennemy Unknown and Civilization, for starters...

[TheVoid]

I gave my only 5 to Hitchhiker's Guide to Galaxy. Pity there's not a 6.
I gave 4 even to a classic like Adventure, which although being the first adventure ever made is bit too short and some other minor flaws.

I regret having given a 4 to Riders of Rohan, a 3 would have been more fair.

[Durak]

I don't regret giving NetStorm a 5 in the slightest. =)

[Maikel]

Originally posted by wormpaul@Nov 3 2004, 12:10 PM
I almost never give normal games a 1 or 2...

Only games that are so weak...but that aren`t much games :not_ok:

1 and 2's won't be added


Well maybe it's an idea to extend the ratings from 1 to 5 to 1 to 10. A bigger differentiation. I will have to see if it's possible to do it without much trouble, otherwise it's not worth it.

[wormpaul]

I got now a game that deserves a 3..

Is that good enough for on the site??

It`s not a bad game, only to simple to deserve a 4 :angel:

[Maikel]

It depends. Abandonia is all about quality and classics. So if the game is either a ''not perfect classic which a lot of people like'' or ''I believe a lot of people can actually have a good time with it'' .. then it's ok to put it on. Otherwise it isn't .

[wormpaul]

OK, it goes about the game Pipe o Mania..

It`s really a small game but i had fun with it, so that`s why i decided that we can get it on the site...but still playing the game so i can give all level codes with the review :angel: