«

[Xalo]

Originally posted by plix+Jan 23 2006, 05:02 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (plix @ Jan 23 2006, 05:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Xalo@Jan 23 2006, 10:06 AM
i use pascal and basic... nothing too special, but quite good for my age. i'm the only here who hates all those "visual" langauges? why all that (word).(word).(word).(word).(word).(word).(word).( word).(word).(word).(word).(word) is necesary? i understand object programing but thats not order to make it more easy, it's like bureaucracy!!

Object-orientation didn't originate with, nor is it unique to, the "Visual" family of programming language dialects. Furthermore, OOP provides the same abstraction as a bureaucracy, but that abstraction provides a lot more than just complex indirection. I love procedural programming as much as anyone, but using OOP for large projects (anything over 10k lines or so) makes the source a lot easier to understand and maintain. [/b][/quote]
maybe it is easier for big projects, but still i dislike this system(it's only my personal opinion).

[chickenman]

Can you please try to stay on topic !

: It looks like C++ is the most used around here

still no one uses assembly

[Xalo]

Originally posted by chickenman@Jan 24 2006, 09:34 AM
Can you please try to stay on topic !

: It looks like C++ is the most used around here

still no one uses assembly

what is that assembly? i use something called "assembler" in pascal. is it the same?

[Rogue]

Other lnaguages....

C, C++, Java, PHP, Java Scripts, HTML, Basic (my first programming language), Visual Basic (from version 4), VB for Applications (Access mostly).

[STFM]

I did z81, 68000 and mc68hc11 assembly and C in university - not fun.
Now Java. Previous Pascal, Forth, Smalltalk, Cobol, CL, RPG, C+, Lattice C, GFA and other archaic languages

[Xalo]

Originally posted by Master MC@Jan 22 2006, 01:49 PM
Don't laugh at me, I make programs on my calculator (CASIO fx-9850).

my friend, quite a computer master for his age, said me that on calculator you can only make algorithmes, not true programs.

truely sorry to admins for taking off from topic, all my respect
but i must say this:
MC master:
i finaly figured out why bureaucracy kept it alive for 13 years - it took 13 years to write and sign all forms to make it officialy dead
sorry to admins again

[Kon-Tiki]

't Depends, I guess. I've made whole UI-based programs on a TI800 calculator, back in highschool. Shouldn't've forced us all to get those calculators if they didn't want people to make programs on it that'd cheat on tests. Of course, by the time it was made, you knew what you had to know inside-out :whistle:

Anyways, you actually can make real programs for calculators. There was even Zelda for the TI800.

[Master MC]

@Xalo: very lame joke

Well I did make some nice programs, both entertaining and useful. It is easy to impress newb-like classmates.

Oops, exam in one hour, better write a program...

[Xalo]

then is there any diference between calculator and computers then?
technology evolutes much faster than humans do....
once 1gb hdd was something incredible, but now there are hdds with capacity
of terrabytes(1000 gb) and that's not the border.

P.S. mc, sorry for that joke, i was just defending my point of view.
better nazi than that what was in my country

[Master MC]

I always thought the definition of a computer is 'something you can program'. So calculators are in fact computers.

@Xalo
What happened in Latvia? What could be worse than Nazi regime? Russian occupation?
Sorry if I don't know the history of Latvia...