«

[Viking Zombie]

Isn't it quite awesome? Aside from the shitty campaign.

[_r.u.s.s.]

is campagin shitty? i thought it would be a good part about it, since they ruined multiplayer gaming by not including lan. that makes the game a fail, doesn't it?

[bobson]

I'm playing campaign currently, and IMO it is interesting. Each mission so far is not only a different map, but different goals and settings are shown, each mission shows something new. I'm not a RTS fan, but this game I shall finish (I was to lame to finish the first SC)

I really like the storyline made by Blizzard, I enjoyed Warcraft III, and Starcraft currently is not worse, but I'm at 1/3 of completion, so my opinion may change.

[Viking Zombie]

Originally Posted by bobson

I'm playing campaign currently, and IMO it is interesting. Each mission so far is not only a different map, but different goals and settings are shown, each mission shows something new. I'm not a RTS fan, but this game I shall finish (I was to lame to finish the first SC)

I really like the storyline made by Blizzard, I enjoyed Warcraft III, and Starcraft currently is not worse, but I'm at 1/3 of completion, so my opinion may change.

Well, IMO, they included about as much story in the whole campaign as they did in the first few StarCraft campaign. Aside form the storyline though the campaign is acceptable as it does include a diversity of missions rather than the bland "Oh, kill these guys and do it again in the next mission." So, yeah.

[_r.u.s.s.]

but diversity and good gameplay themselves are the main aspects of a game. how can you say it's shitty o_O

[Kearnsy]

I started playing campaign and I like the mission variety and upgrades.

Multiplayer is the best part, but you need to know a lot about the fine points of the game to do well.

[Wicky]

VikingZombie, asking if a game is awesome while posting a banner of your advanced achievements in this very same game means, it sucks - but they have brainwashed you into thinking of it's greatness.