«

[vivian_evelina]

-

[Japo]

Vivian, I agree with you about Civ3, Civ is the breakthrough and Civ2 is the peak.

I didn't notice that. A typical programmer's easter egg.

[blastradius14]

They are placeables, I bet. I'll look at it again, but you can set up the specific tiles to do something or other with accordance to a trigger, or other such nonsense.

Maybe its a lost fantastic worlds' Tree unit from Midgard....

[Red XIII]

I agree, CivII is the one and only. I never got used to CivIII and CivIV even lies around right next to me without me touching it. It has become just too complex. Sometimes simple games can be much more fascinating than complex ones. Probably I'm just too lazy to find out good strategies in CivIV.

[laiocfar]

I think that both games Civ III should have be better, it is too similar to Civ II and new features arent so new. It is most like an update of graphics and sound. There are some big changes as strategic resources but they didnt build a new game from these good ideas, they pasted them in this better Civ II and they final product lacks of internal armony. Example: it ends beign better to build mines in plains ar start of games or the game turned more complex in diplomacy and the AI acts as always or the war should become more strategic but we always end fighting against the hordes of the AI.

[blastradius14]

Could always make a game exactly the same as a civ2 game, if you want to play civ 2 with new immersing graphics. Make all resources bonus, make the resource req. of things nothing, so that only the tech lets you do it, and remove the unit update thing. Don't know what to do about Leonardo's Workshop though, they kinda messed that one up :bleh:

You can do other stuff too, like remove armies; and the newer scientific leaders.

the best strategy game i ever played

has the download been taken off the game?

[The Fifth Horseman]

Yes, it has, and for a good reason.

[manan_force]

it was my first TBA. and i like it so much. :brain: