Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Tech Corner
Memberlist Forum Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-12-2011, 03:41 PM   #51
florianix
Abandonia nerd
 
florianix's Avatar


 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scatty View Post
Which is probably the point of all problems - "hard"ware. There's been non-public development and testing of new form(s) of completely different, to what is officially available today, branch of computer(s) for quite some years now. Half-organic, biologically based processing to be more precise. But it's very hard to find anything on that in any news and it will probably still take many and many more years before it could even be considered widely available. If, and when it will, that might be turning point in backwards compatibility which we are experiencing with today's conventional hardware, not counting some of the other advantages it would have.

Those technologies have only been very basic research topics that are far from leaving some research labs, and I really doubt that most of them ever will.

Most of them are more usefull to e.g. print circuits on a price-tag very cheap, but less for improving computing power.

The technologies that will increase computing-power/speed in the mid term will probably be the next steps in semiconductor processes (maybe GaN, which is now already commercially available for very high speed transistors).

In fact, it doesn't really matter *which* HW-technolgy a computer is based on (there already were mechanical, electro-mechanical, tube, transistor based technologies of what is more or less still the same logical implementation of a computer).

About accuracy: Modern computers already can already do calculations with unlimited accuracy (just a matter of computing power), and even standard single or double precision outperform any analog computer by far.
Thats the reason why those are obsolete since many decades (and never will come back).

I see fuzzy-logic, neural networks (and many other things that were/are considered "revolutionary" for some years) as software-topics. Just about algorithms, not hardware...

However, amazing how this thread turned from ancient computers to future technology...
florianix is offline                         Send a private message to florianix
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2011, 04:25 PM   #52
florianix
Abandonia nerd
 
florianix's Avatar


 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Japo View Post
Backwards compatibility was the one and only reason, weighting against a number of opposite considerations, that caused the industry to choose the AMD x64 architecture instead of the now extinct Itanium pushed by Intel. If the industry had been neutral towards backwards compatibility, not to mention if it had wanted to curtail it, the result would have been just the opposite.
The fact that Intel always put priority on backwards compatibility was one of the main reasons that their architecture got the established industry standard.
In the end I can only say it was the right decision.... We maybe saw some better architectures, but they are dead now and that was finally worse for their users.
In my opinion this was very helpfull in the end as we now have a situation where most computers share a common architecture (and compatibility).
Of course they even kept backwards compatibility where it was completely ridiculous and nobody ever needed it (thinking about the famous A20-Gate...).
florianix is offline                         Send a private message to florianix
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2011, 08:17 PM   #53
Eagle of Fire
Friendly Fire
 
Eagle of Fire's Avatar

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valleyfield, Canada
Posts: 4,892
Default

Quote:
Of course they even kept backwards compatibility where it was completely ridiculous and nobody ever needed it (thinking about the famous A20-Gate...).
Yeah but how could they defeat the Terminators without those obsolete computers? Viva el compatibility!
__________________
I'm on a hot streak... Literally.
Proud member of The Abandoned since 2005.
Eagle of Fire is offline                         Send a private message to Eagle of Fire
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2011, 09:46 PM   #54
florianix
Abandonia nerd
 
florianix's Avatar


 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle of Fire View Post
Yeah but how could they defeat the Terminators without those obsolete computers? Viva el compatibility!
Sorry... I absolutely don't get it...

Who do you mean by "terminators"?
And "obsolete computers" are the ones including the strange structures keeping it backwards compatible?

Probably I don't have my brain in gear.

Anyway... thinking about my argument about the A20 gate again... it was terribly wrong... In fact its needed to be able to boot DOS on modern computers... (might the DOSbox evangelists forgive me that comment)
florianix is offline                         Send a private message to florianix
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2011, 10:56 PM   #55
The Fifth Horseman
FUTURE SCIENCE BASTARD
 
The Fifth Horseman's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by florianix View Post
And "obsolete computers" are the ones including the strange structures keeping it backwards compatible?
No. "Obsolete" as in "no longer in use".

Quote:
Probably I don't have my brain in gear.
Probably.
Quote:
Who do you mean by "terminators"?
Near-indestructible killer robots, optionally coated in cloned human tissue, created to systematically wipe out every human being.
__________________

"God. Can't you people see I'm trying to commit a crime against science and nature here?"
-- Reed Richards
The Fifth Horseman is offline                         Send a private message to The Fifth Horseman
Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2011, 07:56 AM   #56
florianix
Abandonia nerd
 
florianix's Avatar


 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 72
Default


Will get some coffee for my ancient, to get my obsolete brain in order.
[waiting for that joke to work and to die laughing (much) later... ]

Last edited by florianix; 27-12-2011 at 08:03 AM.
florianix is offline                         Send a private message to florianix
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2012, 07:50 PM   #57
saibot216
Super Freak
 
saibot216's Avatar


 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 189
Default

My family still has our old Dell Windows 95.
saibot216 is offline                         Send a private message to saibot216
Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2012, 09:36 AM   #58
KrazeeXXL
BORG

 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dog City, Cayman Islands
Posts: 107
Default

I still have a fully operational Pentium 200 MMX standing around here but didn't use it for years. But it's there so if I ever feel a huge retro-urge...

normally it's sufficiently treated with a good portion of Dosbox but you never know
KrazeeXXL is offline                         Send a private message to KrazeeXXL
Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2012, 03:53 PM   #59
Scatty
Treasure hunter
 
Scatty's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Little big small world
Posts: 1,906
Default

You'd still have some trouble running Quake 1 in DosBox The Dos version that is. On that Pentium II it would run like a charm though. Or take Warhammer - Shadow of the Horned Rat. It doesn't run so well in modern Windows, but if you take a (quite hard to find as rare) Dos version of it, DosBox could barely handle it. Just some examples.
Scatty is offline                         Send a private message to Scatty
Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2012, 12:43 AM   #60
KrazeeXXL
BORG

 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dog City, Cayman Islands
Posts: 107
Default

haha Quake 1. remember that one. Good old Matrox Mystique times

but not that much later I used the mouse to play shooters and it wasn't really possible to play Quake1 this way. It was a good game though but the controls would be a bit too much retro for me. you know, aim up with pageup-key or what I used these days... - kinda mission impossibru now - was even awful to play this way back then

Quake 2 is another story

but damn, now I have to find out if that old rig is still running xD

edit: typo

Last edited by KrazeeXXL; 14-01-2012 at 01:10 PM.
KrazeeXXL is offline                         Send a private message to KrazeeXXL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computers on Ebay catchaserguns Tech Corner 2 06-09-2009 12:31 AM
The troubles with old computers.... The_Lemming Tech Corner 14 05-05-2009 08:47 AM
The trut of the computers hahajejeje Blah, blah, blah... 3 09-01-2009 11:18 PM
Other Computers Emulation Rogue Old Suggestions 32 22-08-2005 05:21 PM
64 Bit Computers? mm_pie Tech Corner 18 05-08-2005 05:57 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 08:04 AM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.