«

[Tom Henrik]

Sing along (click me)

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.

Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table.

David Hume could out-consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, [some versions have 'Schopenhauer and Hegel']

And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzche couldn't teach ya
'Bout the raising of the wrist.
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.

Plato, they say, could stick it away--
Half a crate of whisky every day.

Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle.
Hobbes was fond of his dram,

And René Descartes was a drunken fart.
'I drink, therefore I am.'

Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed,
A lovely little thinker,
But a bugger when he's pissed.

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Sorry...
Just had to get it out of my system... :P

[Puffin]

Wow, I am truly proud of postin my message after Tom. Congratulation, Tom Henrik, on the great sound! You are a inspiration to us all!!!

To answer the question of this topic. I go to school over winter. Then I work at Subways ("where fresh is the taste!") and at a nursing home.
JEI! :?

[Tom Henrik]

ops:

Gee... Thanks....

(I know, I know.... I am the coolest Smurf on this site :twisted: )

The Pizzard wrote:

Yes it is because "Treat your opposite like you want him to treat you.." compeletely satisfy criterion of Kategorischer Imperativ: Handle nur nach derjenigen Maxime, durch die du zugleich wollen kannst, dass sie ein allgemeines Gesetz werde. :shock:

Better now? :wink:

boy oh boy.. like this thing is starting to get outta my league.. :shock:

[Tom Henrik]

boy oh boy.. like this thing is starting to get outta my league.. :shock:

What?
Even monthy Python?! :P

Sing, dammit! :twisted:

[The Niles]

Better now?


Actually no. Not if you want to state the categorical imperative. But I don't mind your signature at all.

[The Niles]

The categorical imperativ is bullish. *
Explanation follow:
1. Morality demands that we achieve autonomy wherever and whenever possible.
2. If (1), then there is no justification for any coercive regulation.
3. If there is no justification for any coercive regulation, then we should adopt anarchism.
4. Therefore, we should adopt anarchism.
:twisted:

This is not an explanation. Why does morality demand that we achieve autonomy?

ARRGGHH! Stop that, my head is going to swirl already! :shock: :evil:

Im better...Mwahahahaha...

BTW...FreeFreddy whats that pic of anyways...???the avatar?