Quote:
Originally Posted by marko river
Why? LOL2 was bad?
I mean, I remember playing first 2 discs and I really got into the story and the world. Great mix of fighting, stealth, environment interaction and puzzles. But could be my memory plays tricks with me.
|
Maybe I mispronounced, but I meant that the sequels were not bad, but they were not on the same level as the prequels.
I played a bit
LOL2, but the truth is that I did not like the introduction of “real” digitized characters. I preferred cartoonized digitized characters. I watched on YouTube the interaction of 2 soldiers with the god (with demon appearance). It was not good.
The same goes for the games I quoted. I liked
Dune II more than
Dune 2000 (sort of improved Dune II as well as
Warcraft II);
LOK1 was more interesting, because
LOK2 had ridiculously difficult puzzles, the story of the
hands and
feet of the evil wizard dispenses comments...
Just to give you an idea, the “new”
King’s Bounty and
Fantasy Wars series from
1C Company has spectacularly digitized cut-scenes. Well, the
Diablo series managed to make non-cartoonized digitized cut-scenes done well.
PS: This would just be my personal opinion, but I noticed that the author of a Walkthrough also considered LOL2 acceptable while the
LOL3 was inedible.
