I wasn't comparing the DOSBox info review section with the DOSBox wiki, but with having the same info in the review page but separated in fields (cycles, etc.)
If you ask me I prefer the information to be on the official DOSBox website first, and here second. It's there that I would refer first myself.
Although I didn't know they had that wiki section as well as the
"compatibility" website tab, where most of the info currently is, and which users could already expand and comment.