Just fealt like i had to clarify something regarding the "Admin War":
Me and Tom went at eachother.. umm.. last spring?
It was all out fun, and we changed our titles and information over and over again, and anyone sticking theire head it, go the same treatment.
This was possible, since the forum and member-croud was MUCH smaller then.
Everyone saw it as a free show, and we kept at it for a while.
There where NEVER any seriousness in it, but beside the fact of PURE entertainment.
With that cleard, on to the next:
Kosta said someting good here:
Quote:
|
As for the warn meter, there isn't an ISO standard that defines spamming, so we can't define it either.
|
This is one of the absolute hardest things to define.
Common, do you think you would keep getting spam-mails for Viagra if NOONE at all bought it? Those few persons wouldn't define the mail as spam, but rather as an offer.
Same goes for spam-posts. There is no other way to judge what is spam, then your own oppinion.
Quote:
|
Some threats are getting closed and reopened. Obviously admins/mods aren't always of the same opinion (it's only natural), but such things aren't setting good examples.
|
I only know of ONE occation where this would have involved an Admin vs Admin situation (with me beeing the opening part).
It was a situation that caused alot of talking in the admins corner of the forum; and we have agreed on some rules to minimize the risks of this happening w/o reasons.
Thread may STILL be re-opend, but it will NOT be due to a single mind, more like the ressult of a vote among the Admins/Moderators.
Last: Sebatianos; You are one of our loudest members in the forum, always speaking up.
Keep at it.
k:
Even if you get flatten out in the end, or come out as the "winner", it's good to have someone with new ideas, who express it in a good way, and not just