Civ2's graphics were too Windows-like, I didn't like that, but one got used to it after a while. Anyway I prefer graphics which are immersive, everything's about the game not the operating system. I guess everybody prefers so, that's why now all games are full-screen.
Anyway it's true that Civ2 is but an upgrade of Civ, but that's not bad, at least it's better than screwing the thing up like in Civ3 --in my humble opinion. I played Civ1 for hours which ammounted to months altogether, and then when I saw Civ2 I thought it was a bad sequel and wouldn't ever play it. But now when I want to play Civ I play Civ2, it's got everyrhing from Civ1 and combats are not too random like in the first game.
__________________
Life starts every day anew. Prospects not so good...
|