I hope my upcoming game never gets listed here.
Mine is- Beneath a Steel Sky.

The promotional materials about The Ring, before it came out, made the game sound like a creative effort the like of which has never been seen before in any of the arts. There were also no details about game features. From all this, I figured it was probably going to be pretty bad, but I was wrong. It was truly, amazingly, terrible.

Wow! What was it about Steel Sky that you didn't like? I rather liked it...

And as for your game... when's the beta-demo gonna be released? :ok:

daikatana
blood 2
soul reaver 2
blood omen 2
akira (on amiga)
alien breed 3d (amiga)
total carnage (amiga)
chaos engine 2
quake 3 (hey i LIKED quake 2)
formula 1 '97 (psx)

a whole bunch of others i can think of

Not sure. Just didn't like it. I tried to, but couldn't.

Disappointing games:

fly! - garbage
counterstrike - overrated
silent hunter 2 and desroyer command - no dynamic campaign, crappy ship animations, bad online gameplay
interstate 82 - jesus christ this was a baaaaaaaaaad game

i am no longer buying any electronic arts games - they are bastards

new games generally suck because the developers are hoping to cash in on the lastest society trend (for example: nfs underground, lord of the rings, yu-gi-oh), when gaming was for hardcore geeks they had to make good games or people would go back to dungeons and dragons and axis and allies :)

developers of games like HL2 and DOOM3 have a lot of pressue on them to make a great game, i don't think this formulated approach always works to create a classic like the first game was.

Hmm lsl:manga cum laude.

I agree 100%
WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?????:not_ok:

Still need to play that game...

but is it really so worse???

Yes, lsl magna cum laude.
They had to know it was horrible. Just playing through five whole minutes its obvious the game is without class. Definately not al-lowe worthy.
On a scale of 1 - 10 I'd give it a rating of Worthless.