Forums

Forums (http://www.abandonia.com/vbullet/index.php)
-   Gaming Zone (http://www.abandonia.com/vbullet/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   ScummVM 0.13.1 (http://www.abandonia.com/vbullet/showthread.php?t=19152)

Paco 03-03-2009 05:19 PM

ScummVM 0.13.1
 
ScummVM 0.13.0 came out some days ago.

It support 4 new Game (ie. The 7th Guest!) and some change.

a List what changed in the new Version is here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shown...ease_id=662248

you can downloads it here:
http://www.scummvm.org/downloads.php

now happy discussing. ^_^

peace01 04-03-2009 07:31 AM

why not just use dos box?
 
As for multiple computer platforms mess is better.
Though I personally find it better to get indivuals emulators usually though Mame is great asrcade machines and Fusion is good for sega machines.
If Mirosoft can't beat dos box for dos emulation no one will. I go with the best and leave the rest behind.

TotalAnarchy 04-03-2009 01:56 PM

But seriously - only 0.13 in 7 years, that's so slow!

hahajejeje 04-03-2009 04:11 PM

Who cares Anarchy,is Scumm VM!!! god I remeber when my brother got it and play the Day of tentacle :)

Capo 04-03-2009 05:21 PM

- Added support for Blue's 123 Time Activities.
- Added support for Blue's ABC Time Activities.

:|

Japo 04-03-2009 06:13 PM

ScummVM is not really an emulator nor even a VM. It's a re-make for modern platforms of several game engines (for DOS).

red_avatar 04-03-2009 06:28 PM

I'm not a big user of SCUMMVM. Even before I had Dosbox, I preferred different ways of getting those games to work. ScummVM is a bit like Exult for Ultima VII: it's not an emulator but rather a re-write of the game's engine. I prefer an authentic experience over the ScummVM experience. For many people it won't make a difference and Dosbox is still harder to use than ScummVM but if you when it to be authentic, Dosbox still beats ScummVM by far.

_r.u.s.s. 05-03-2009 08:17 AM

well the games that are supported are pixel to pixel authentic

Szilvio 13-04-2009 08:41 PM

Is supported games faster in ScummVM, than in DOSBox? I always played in native DOS or in DOSBox, so I even do not know what ScummVM able to do. I guess supported games are more tested than in DOSBox?
I decided to use DOSBox, because it seemed more universal, despite of that I had to read a manual and make tries to set it up. But in the end it was fun without big problems. I know some people do not like to read manuals, but life is easier and less problematical, so it is not a wasted time, if you try to read them... :)

So I vote for DOsBox, but I'd like to know what people think about the other alternatives...

_r.u.s.s. 13-04-2009 08:57 PM

of course it's universal and once you get the game running i don't think you can get any "faster" speed since it's all adventures. well, theoretically speaking, yes scummvm is of course faster


The current time is 07:21 AM (GMT)

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.