If you just type LOL you get this:
LOL But if you type :LOL: you get this: :[img]http://www.abandonia.com/forum/html/emoticons/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /> |
...with this information...I could...RULE THE WORLD! WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :twisted:
|
it are 2 different emo's, you can choose it depending on the amount of laughing you have to do ;)
well maybe I should remove the :[img]http://www.abandonia.com/forum/html/emoticons/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /> one... what 'd you think? |
Quote:
|
LOL l0l what i didnt get it? huh?
|
Any chance that we could have the still one as the second option (or the : L OL : )as sometimes the moving one comes across as corny if you add it to a pm. The exisiting double emoticon could be removed, I think, thanks, Braindead.
In other words, I'm voting for both LOL and the the still emoticon as a replacement for the double emoticon : L O L : please. |
i like this LOL
|
Quote:
|
I like the present acromyn for the still one as it's easy to remember :)
Thanks for that :ok: |
My point wasn't that there were 2 different emoticons, but rather that the second one showed up wrong:
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/8720/buglol7lv.png Apparently though, this doesn't happen in Firefox (I use Opera :P), but try quoting my post and see for yourself. I think it's got something to do that :LOL: can create both the still and the animated emoticons all in one, which... well, confuses IPB :wacko: |
I enjoy having all the laughing emotes because it looks really corny having a post full of lo'l instead of LOL
|
The current time is 07:55 PM (GMT) |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.