personally, i don' t think DS9 would make a great movie as the plot would take place in a stationary space station. the "mobility" factor as a great impact in such kind of movies.

as continuing voyager would be a hard task, as all the crew was "promoted" so virtualy they all would be "out" :not_ok: .

5 things shrek.
1: that stationary space station bs is what people always pull out when they dont like ds9. say something original.
2: babylon5 had a great plot and was on a space station.
3: ds9 had a great plot and was set on a space station. if you disagree u clearly didnt watch it.
4: a movie set during the dominion wars = multiple locations not just the station.
5: the defiant is the coolest ship in startrek e v e r she got the moves, and if i give her antimatter mines twin pulse phaser and photon i can take out a romulan warbird with her on captain difficulty on sfc3. she got the moves, check out sacrifice of angels episode of ds9.

is it just me or did the ships look better in ds9 than they did in enterprise? i think its because they were real models that were animated by computer rather than pure cg.

DS9 ships do look better than NG, becouse of technical advancement. My opinion is the ships look best in Voyager, probably becouse it's made after DS9 is finished...

what re you talking about? the ships looked great in everything but the original series (and those toy ships mosels in TOS give me a warm filling even despite not being realistic, guess I haven't really grown out of toy ships yet :angel: )

pls noite, very drunk.
\wehat im talking about is thAT.
paramount used to make models and then photo tyhem in 3d. now what they do is they completly generate them in 3d. there ius a huge difference between a rw model that is digiatlally animated and a pure digitall model that is digitally animated.

Um... OMG you are drunk indeed....geeez you should see a doctor dude...
I think Comp animatinon is far better then tiny modells. After all this is the 21. century... :D

ok im sober now so i can elocute a little more the concept im trying to get across here. there are two ways of doing startrek style fx. 1 way is to make a model and then photograph it using a special (and very expensive) 3d camera. u then use the computers to move it, ie: plot in the vectors the model will follow. it has a different , more "solid" look than pure cg. you can get a solid look from pure cg. but it takes a lot more renders than they bothered to do with the new enterprise show.

Yeah, they changed how they animate things in Enterprise... That is the problem. And the masking is too different if you ask me...

it just doesnt look right.

Exactly! It looks too stupid and childish to me. Even the vulcans and klingons look too idiotic... Thats wrong.... :not_ok: