03-02-2005 06:46 PM | ||
Wired | Sure, but why would you wan't to spew out 1000+ word at the end of every post anyway? | |
03-02-2005 06:33 PM | ||
JJXB | 1 picture can say more than 1000 words ever could. like this | |
03-02-2005 06:18 PM | ||
Wired | I can't understand how anyone can get worked up about sigs? They are completely useless, and that's a fact. | |
22-01-2005 07:01 PM | ||
Maikel |
haha, poor jjxb take a beer on me! |
|
22-01-2005 02:29 PM | ||
JJXB | ffs, i gave up trying to get the rules changed because no admin would see a reasonable change in this ages back, what makes anyone else think they can do it?? whats the point in trying to point out some reasonable boundaries when they won't be accepted??? thats the one thing that frustrates me most about this board. | |
22-01-2005 12:38 PM | ||
xoopx |
Quote:
thats true, but they could still set a maximum filesize, and if people could fit one into that size (png-8 format maybe?) then it would be all good. for me, as long as a banner doesnt make the horizontal scrollbar appear at 1024x768, im not bothered. its the HEIGHT thats all important. too high and its too intrusive and also means people have to scroll more. |
|
22-01-2005 12:02 PM | ||
mouse31e |
Quote:
|
|
22-01-2005 11:53 AM | ||
JJXB | authsor, don't bother trying to get them to change the signature rules, i tried VERY HARD and they did not budge (even though my suggestions were reasonable) so i don't see a damn thing in hell you'll ever be able do to get the rules changed. | |
22-01-2005 11:45 AM | ||
auhsor | Meh, it looks like overkill, but it's nice, and it works quite well, and I havn't seen any complaints there. | |
22-01-2005 11:29 AM | ||
xoopx |
Quote:
why on earth would they let the height be up to 100, and the width 500 but not at the same time? the height=100 version already takes up 100 pixels of someones page, so shortening the width is completely pointless. |
|
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |