Petition

[TaloN]

I hereby invite anyone who feels the same way as myself that the sig rules should increase the maximum width of a sig to 150px. This is a general size used in sigs and whilst being larger than the present allowed size (60px) is still reasonable and allows the use of a reasonable canvas to construct signatures on.

I totally agree with the arguement that large sigs are annoying and completely unnessary, but i find the present size of 60px unreasonably small to do anything remotely artistic in.

If im out of order please delete this and PM to tell me why. Otherwise i hope this will be a constructive petition to improve the forums to facilitate the enjoyment of all who use them.

signed

Talo^N

[Iron_Scarecrow]

LOL LOL LOL

Oh this is hilarious. It will never work.

[JJXB]

im all in favour, i doubt it'll work but i'll support it :)

[The Niles]

I don't think you are out of order but this was in the wrong place. Moved to comments and suggestions.

[Omuletzu]

You see this is what i don't understand:
Why would you think you were out of order???
We don't exercise communism around here so you are free to make suggestions

[taikara]

I support the petition! As an artist, I have to agree it's rather limiting. It's hard enough to make avvies at 100x100 that look decent. 60 pixels... bleh.

But not too big, obviously.

Edit: With all these sig discussions lately, my "badge" is making me feel hypocritical, LOL.

[Chris]

<--- undersigned

at least a size of 100x450 would not be to annoying and fit everyones needs.

EDIT: as for the bandwith, the 30kB restriction should remain. to me that's the main point and not the height or width of the sig.

[Kon-Tiki]

I still find 60x450 big enough. Got to learn to see limitations as a challenge :bleh:

[JJXB]

@kon-tiki: there was a time i did 400x120 sigs. now my standard size is 400x90. i have learnt about limitations once before, i see no need to make all of my sigs size 400x60 from now on. why? i have done it once before and i am not willing to make those permamanent changes again.

[Kon-Tiki]

Your current one's 60x400 and awesome. I don't see what the problem is then. You're under the limitation, not even on it, and got a cool one.

[JJXB]

im only using this sig size for these forums, that means i have to make 2 versions of my sig (standard size and reduced size)

[taikara]

This is a petition for bigger sig sizes. If you don't agree, there's a discussion on the topic in 3XBlah.

And @JJXB & Kon-Tiki: Both of you have nice sigs. But that doesn't mean it's not difficult for the rest of us peons to come up with something we really like. :D

[wormpaul]

i agree

[Sebatianos]

Just a big :not_ok: from me. Once we start putting up bigger sigs - that won't be enough, so someone will start asking for even bigger...
You want a sig - make it small enough.

[Mad-E-Fact]

You people realize that a thread is increasingly hard to read, the more it is perforated by huge graphics that serve no purpose whatsoever? ;)

[Rogue]

I don't care as I disabled them in preferences.

[Lizard]

If you can disable them in preferences when it becames too annoying then why the sig limiting? :blink:
Undersigned

[wormpaul]

Wich big signatures you take too much bandwith from the server

Braindead: small or big sigs doesn't matter for server bandwidth since sigs are hosted elsewhere...

[Luchsen]

Oh no, you have won... :cry: :D

Signature Rules (http://www.abandonia.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=839)

[NrmMyth]

I don't like big signatures, becouse when you read post you have more scrolling to do than reading. :bye:

For this you could start a poll!

[Tom Henrik]

New rules:

http://www.abandonia.com/forum/index.php?s...t=0&#entry88581 (http://www.abandonia.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=839&st=0&#entry88581)


This time we WILL enforce the rules.